| Message |
is the future. That's different than where you started, with non-facts, presented as facts, that perpetuate the wrong arguments. The arguments, imo, should not be about the little stuff, or about whether Obama (as opposed to some other politician) is corrupt, but about how we can maintain our wonderful lifestyle for centuries to come. Fossil fuels ain't it. Bjorn Lomborg has written on how we are approaching the problem wrong, and I think you'd agree with him on much of it. He cites wasted money, but proposes a better way.
|
 |